Thursday, December 24, 2009
What I Learned About Myself and my Neighborhood
I also learned that I still have a ways to go before I actually can go out in the world and do this completely on my own but that it’s still okay because the more I try to grasp the strengths I have and let go of my weaknesses, then the better I really do get. I am still grappling with if I can pull reporting off but I am confidant then I will get the true gist of it soon, with a little bit more practice. I did like how challenging and engaging this course was and how I had to really push myself to do the assignments in a way that I can actually be proud to have written them. I do wish that the awkwardness of interviewing strangers will dispel with some time and practice, too. My favorite part of the course, no doubt, was definitely the more creative aspect of reporting where you can submerge yourself with details and descriptions and I hope to continue to do that in my future stories.
I learned many things about my neighborhood this semester. It was especially interesting for me because I was reporting on two different neighborhoods all semester, which was the Fillmore and Pacific Heights. I did have some trouble because I tried really hard to not seem more inclined to report on one but not enough the other. However, it was extremely interesting to see the infinite differences between the two neighborhood and how economically, socially, and racially, these two neighborhoods have so much division and exclusion from each other.
Despite the difficulties, it was amazing for me to see and hear about how rich these two neighborhoods are. The Fillmore being so rich in culture while Pacific Heights being so rich in money. I thoroughly enjoyed both of the neighborhoods and felt that even though things there don’t always seem so great, especially with each other, it is undeniable what alluring aspects both neighborhoods have on me and others. They both are definite enclaves of San Francisco and will continue to be that. It will be exciting and interesting too see how time will change these neighborhoods from what they were, to how they are, to what they will be.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Final Story Hayes Valley
Crowds of people stand huddled together listening to the holiday tunes coming from the portable stage set up at Patricia’s Green for the 6th Annual Hayes Valley Block Part. The crowds bundled up in multiple layers of clothing hold hot beverages to keep themselves warm in the piercing cold Friday night.
As Hayes Valley residents watch the main stage the shows producer Joseph Jody stands off stage in his red sequenced Santa hat, Dalmatian spotted jacket, and a feather boa wrapped around his neck. His two dachshunds, Guido and Vinnie, sit in a red Little Red Flyer next to him. Jody looks at the dogs then his clipboard for the next act.
“Where’s the choir?” Jody asks frantically with a slight New York accent.
Jody, a resident of Hayes Valley for 15 years, witnessed the neighborhoods transformation from the seedy side of town to a thriving neighborhood.
“It was depressing,” Jody said, “there were no stores and a lot of buildings were boarded up.”
In 1959 San Francisco used federal money to renovate the cities highways and built the Central Freeway. The freeway cast a shadow over Hayes Valley. The streets were littered with the homeless and prostitutes would prowl around the neighborhood looking for their next customer.
In 1989 the Loma Prieta earthquake severally damaged the Central Freeway overpass in Hayes Valley, which led to its demolition and the creation of Octavia Boulevard in 2005.
The Mayor of Hayes Valley, David Cook, stands against a mailbox guitar strapped to his back. His glazed eyes fixed upon the stage.
“Five years ago you would’ve been robbed on this street,” said Cook.
The 400 block of Hayes Street has been home to Cook for over 14 years. He can be found sitting against the same chain link fence on the same blue milk crate with the same makeshift fishing pole with a cup reading “Gone Fishing” as the hook.
Although Cook has stayed in the same place the area around him has morphed from empty storefronts to chique clothing boutiques and restaurants.
Groups of people patrol up and down Hayes Street with drinks ranging from Pabst Blue Ribbon to hot chocolate in hand. Waves of residents and visitors flow in and out of the many clothing and shoe stores during the 6th annual block party.
“I’m still surprised to walk pass all the stores,” said Mary Baird lifetime San Francisco resident.
At nine the stores start to close, and the crowded streets start to open. The block party is over, but the over 21-crowd move into the couch filled bar, Place Pigalle. Former resident Nico Deliveyne aims his pool stick carefully, and shoots at one of the many solids left on the table. He misses.
“Everybody within a two-block radius you can consider your family,” says Deliveyne’s girlfriend Laura Pucci as she aims for the only striped ball left on the table. “It’s the best secret spot you can stumble into.”
Many Hayes Valley residents agree that since Caltrans tore down the overpass the neighborhood flourished and became a thriving community.
To further develop the neighborhood a proposed interim community garden will fill an empty lot between Oak St., Fell St., Laguna St., and Octavia Blvd. One of the main goals of the project is to serve as a model and resource center for urban agriculture education and green job training, according to the Hayes Valley Neighborhood Association.
Over the next few years the empty lots left from the old overpass will be filled with new multi-unit housing complexes. One planned complex will be affordable housing for disabled individuals and their families. The ground floor of the proposed 15-unit complex would contain space for businesses including a firm for the Nor Cal Vocational Inc. NCVI specializes in providing developmental disabled adults with the opportunity to use art as a vehicle for developing skills. Construction is dated to start next fall, according to Curbed SF.
The destruction of the old Central Freeway overpass led to the resurgence Hayes Valley. With the proposed community garden and multiple housing complexes Hayes Valley will continue to grow. Soon the only remnants of Hayes Valley’s past will be the homeless that still wander around the neighborhood asking for change, collecting cans, or just sitting on a milk crate playing a guitar.
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Final Story: Fighting Prop 8 from the Personal to the Professional
Once Prop 8 passed in the November 2008 election, it seemed that the issue of marriage equality dropped off the political radar. Just because the bill was passed, however, does not mean the fight was over. Groups such as One Struggle, One Fight, and the International Socialist Organization have been doing their part to help raise awareness and support for equality, which recently has taken place in the Castro.
Proposition 8 is cited as the “California Marriage Protection Act”, stating that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid in California. San Francisco issued marriage licenses to same sex couples on Feb. 12, 2004, and, almost 4,000 marriages later, ceased on Mar. 12, 2004 after the California Supreme Court ordered San Francisco officials to stop producing marriage licenses to same sex couples. On Jun. 2, 2008, Proposition 8 qualified for the November 2008 election ballot.
“We stood in line in two and a half, three days in the rain,” Frank Capley-Alfano said. Before he went on Capley-Alfano chimed in smiling, “it was the best three days ever.” The two got married back in 2004 during the Winter of Love when Gavin Newsom allowed gay marriage in San Francisco. “That kind of love was erupting through the city,” Capley-Alfano said. They married at 3:34 in the afternoon on Feb. 17, 2004. Once the California Supreme Court lifted the ban on gay marriage in 2008, the two were one of the first couples to set a date. Both being big on tradition, they got married in the exact spot where they said their “I do’s” back in 2004.
After their marriage, Joe and Frank Capley- Alfano became very active in their community, as well as the state, in rallying up support against Prop 8 by telling their story. It was at this point in time when the two met with the people of One Struggle, One Fight.
Capley- Alfano attended a meeting in San Francisco about grassroots organizing that people were working on to fight against the newly passed Prop 8. “I remember a lot of blame going on and lots of finger pointing and also lots of grand standing,” Capley-Alfano said. During the meeting he noticed Kip Williams. “[Kip] was talking about moving forward and intersections in the communities and building allies outside the LGBT community all these sort of ideas that really were refreshing,” Capley-Alfano said. Capley-Alfano especially liked the idea of direct action and taking the movement back to the streets and the effectiveness of grassroots organizing. They exchanged numbers and started organizing the six day march to Sacramento.
Along with Williams, Flik Huang was one of the founders of the group One Struggle, One Fight. Huang explained that OSOF “work[s] with many different organizations, on a local, state-wide and national level. We have close ties with the labor community, a bond which goes back in the LGBT community as far as Harvey Milk's time. We strive to build coalitions with as many different and progressive groups as possible, for we believe that our struggles are fights for human and civil rights, rather than separate issues [labor, LGBT, immigration, health care]. Hence our name, which comes from an LGBT rights chant from the 70's: "gay, straight, black, white: one struggle, one fight."
Huang remembered how she felt when she heard that Prop 8 Passed. “The next day I cried for a long time. I'd never believed it could pass; who on earth votes to revoke other people's rights? How is that even remotely legal? And felt blindsided and horrified that this had been allowed to take place. I could feel very deeply my friend's - and the LGBT community's - pain and anger, and I had to do something,” she said.
Although a fairly new group, OSOF has become a force with organizing for marriage equality as well as other human rights causes. “In under a year we became one of the most active and recognized grassroots groups in [Northern California], and within the LGBT grassroots community we have a lot of supporters nationally. It's been an arduous, breakneck, often painful and excruciatingly difficult journey, but worth it in so many ways for all we've accomplished and everyone our work [has] had an effect on,” Huang said.
Both the OSOF and International Socialist Organization have done events in the Castro. “Although we often are criticized for ‘preaching to the choir,’ it must be pointed out that many of those who live in and frequent the Castro district, though supportive of our goals, are complacent or indifferent to actually participating in even the most basic ways. We are hoping that our presence in the Castro can help to motivate and mobilize members of our very own community who at the moment are often not even aware that their rights are threatened or what they can do about it,” Huang said.
Recently OSOF, with the help of the ISO and Equality California, held a rally on Nov. 4 at Harvey Milk Plaza noting the one year anniversary of the passing of Prop 8. The night started out with various speakers from each organization, as well as members from the public, talking about how Prop 8 has affected their lives.
“All of us working on the event thought the Castro and specifically Harvey Milk Plaza would be the best place for it. It has significance for the LGBT community and we wanted to draw folks in from off the street who would have common cause,” ISO member Ashley Simmons said about the Nov. 4 rally. “I don't think the Castro is by any means the only place to be having LGBT rallies,” adding, “I think for the political moment it was the appropriate place although OSOF has planned, with many ISO comrades taking part, many actions in the Castro.”
“Whenever we get attacked, we meet at Harvey Milk Plaza,” Capley-Alfano said. Frank Capley-Alfano added, “Historically it has always been a place for community.” He continued to explain that it’s a great common spot to meet and organize, but, depending on the situation, it would be very beneficial to move the protests elsewhere to draw attention to instead of just staying in the Castro.
Capley-Alfano suggested that a creative way to do this is through flash-mobs. The idea of the flash-mob originated on the internet but basically it’s setting a time and event online and on a certain day and people come together for whatever cause it may be- even silly ones like no pants days. Capley-Alfano mentioned that a good example of this would be something called Guerilla Queer Bars; it’s when a group of LGBT members would go to relatively straight bars at a certain time and interact with them showing the patrons that gay people aren’t very different than they are.
Now, this is not to say that the efforts in the Castro have been in vain. “It’s hard to engage people who have politically been beaten down so many times… that they just want to have fun,” Capley-Alfano said, and added that “in terms of engaging our community we need to start being creative.”
Another supporter of marriage equality who has been documenting the various movements is photographer Geoff King. Since the passing of Proposition 8, King has documented various events and rallies in the Bay Area that have taken place since then. He plans on bringing the various images and stories together in a book called “Such a Bittersweet Day”.
King has grown up in the Bay Area. His parents met in San Francisco in the 70s and told him about San Francisco Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk at an early age. He grew up with the understanding of San Francisco’s colorful past that got him interested in documenting the aftermath of Prop 8. He has been photographing various protests and other human rights events since the Iraq War started.
While attending a candle lit vigil on November 5, the day after the election, King overheard someone say it was “such a bittersweet day”, a black man was voted president but gay people were denied the right to marry. “I have to document this going forward,” King said. To him, it was an important civil rights matter; although he wasn’t affected directly by Prop 8, his friends were. He said that it seemed irrational and foreign and wanted to explore the topic more.
A year later, King’s book, “Such a Bittersweet Day”, is a compilation of black and white photos of the demonstrations that have taken place in the past year with captions of an oral history of the movement by journalist Sunny Angulo. All proceeds from the book go to Transgender Law Center and Health Legal Services.
Desiree Aubry spoke at a rally that was put on by OSOF that King photographed in the Castro. She didn’t go up with a speech in hand, like the ones before had. Instead, she stood in front of the crowd and bared her soul for all to hear; it was one of the more emotional speeches of the night. “Hate cannot defeat love,” she said. “No matter how much it [hurts] our hearts… we are going to be strong.”
Aubry joined OSOF because she wanted to help. “It baffles me to this day how people can be so full of hatred and ignorance and how they can justify taking away our rights, taking away our happiness, demeaning us, telling us our lives and our love aren't worth a damn because it's different,” Aubry said when she heard about Prop 8’s passing.
Although Joe and Frank Capley-Alfano were part of the lucky group who got married, and more importantly got to keep their marriage, they had a long battle ahead of them; the couple still faced many financial hardships and discrimination. For five years they have been fighting to get Capley-Alfano put under his husband’s healthcare. Frank Capley-Alfano’s work could deny the joint health care because the federal law does not recognize the two as a couple. “As domestic partners we called the union to see if they could put [Joe] under healthcare as a domestic partner. Of course they said no,” Frank Capley-Alfano said. He works for the International Union of Elevator Constructors, who went with the notion that federal law supersedes state law and therefore did not need to offer domestic partner benefits; the union even sent out a letter defining what they saw as a married couple and what they considered a spouse.
After five years of back and forth with the union and various government officials and appeals, the two finally achieved the equality they worked so hard for. Their excitement was very apparent and contagious when speaking to them. It was a victory well worth celebrating, but it showed that there is still so much more to fight for. “Prop 8 took away and affected a lot more than people who wanted to get married. It opened the door for discrimination of all types in California… all communities to be attacked,” Capley-Alfano said. He then went on to say that “it’s not about marriage equality. It’s about civil equality and about equality for everyone.”
Many No on 8 organizations and supporters have been working hard on campaigning for the next general election in 2010. One Struggle, One fight is currently working on strategizing for their part in the effort to make a change with the California voters come November.
As for the future of LGBT equality, Aubry said she hopes “for full federal equality. I hope that the rest of the world not just the nation can accept us for who we are and who we love. I hope that when we get full equality, we don't forget the past and that we don't become complacent. Complacency is dangerous. If we become complacent we'll forget to fight for the rest of our rights… I want us to be able to be happy and free and truly live our lives, and be considered equal to others. My hope is that our hearts heal from all the breaks we've experienced, and that the anger dissipates. I hope the hate, more than anything disappears and that we can just celebrate love as it is.”
Final Story
A few trees, some patches of grass and dirt, and a “SERVICE VEHICLES ONLY” sign are most of what sits in the lot on the corner of San Jose and Ocean avenues. Next year, this tucked-away corner of Balboa Park will be the location for San Francisco’s fourth skate park.
For months, dozens of residents have been discussing plans for the future of the park at meetings with the Trust For Public Land, a national nonprofit organization that deals with improving parks and preserving green space within them.
“Skate parks bring skaters out of the streets and into the park,” said Yohan Mangsy, a student at San Francisco City College, located across the freeway from Balboa Park. Mangsy, who has been skateboarding for 7 years, says less property damage to walls and ledges are reduced as a direct effect of having skate parks. Less security guards are beat up by skaters and vice versa, he said.
One concerned resident, Pat Ward, said that a skate park might bring more crime into the area and serve as a hub for drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana.
A skatepark brings skaters young and old alike, where in some cases “little kids grow up too fast,” said Mangsy.
“Have you seen the skate park at 25th and Portrero,” asked Christopher Campbell, who rode his skateboard to the TPL meeting, defending the positive aspects of having a skate park. “It turned that neighborhood around,” and gave the kids something to do, he said.
However, Mangsy said that sometimes Norteños pick apples from the apple tree next to the Portrero skate park and throw them at the skaters. The mess of apples also makes the ground dangerously slippery, he said.
Having the highest density of children in San Francisco, Excelsior residents pushed for safe entrances leading into the park. They agreed that entrances should be built as far away from the intersection as possible and a fence keeps skaters from rolling into and out of the park from the crosswalks. The skate park is being built on the corner of one of the area’s busiest intersections, according to an SFMTA pedestrian and bike traffic study.
It will cost between $250,000 and $400,000 to build the skate park.
Companies including PG&E, Levi’s and GAP have matched the $1 million that TPL has raised and will match $4 million if they can raise it. However, the fund has hardly passed the $2.5 million mark.
These Balboa Park Improvements meetings allow the community to have input in deciding how this money will be spent.
Other funding comes from a $75,000 Community Challenge grand that goes towards park development only if ADA accessible pathways are constructed at the entrances.
Mike Neumann, principal of Neumann Construction Management, said that drawing plans would occur in the winter and bidding in March. Construction would begin three months after the lowest bidder is chosen, and residents can expect six to eight months before the project is complete, he said.
However, the city, not the community, will chose which companies to contract for everything between concrete and labor, said Jacob Gilchrist, a TPL landscape director.
Other plans for the Balboa Park’s renovation include a new play area, including 14-foot-tall swings, new play and picnic areas, and lighting improvement.
The fund will be distributed according to what the community prioritizes, said Gilchrist.
(Re)Discovering China Basin
Some pictures of the old pavement tell a different story: a long crack in the asphalt with grass growing in it showed that the ground beneath the pavement had been sinking for some time previous to the break (pictures here soon). Given the intersection's location along the old creekbed, it seems more ikely that the heavy rains undermined the massive old pipes, causing them to shift and burst.
I wanted to go there Saturday night when I found the story online, but I was fighting off the flu, besides, I would have needed a rubber raft to get near the place. But I could really picture the whole scene and imagined what might happen if things got out of hand. I pictured the old creek coming to life again and the deep magic washing the whole Mission Bay neighborhood into the sea, just like when Narnia awoke in the famous book and all the bridges fell and the animals started talking again.
But back to reality:
When I took the China Basin beat this semester, I honestly wasn't sure what part of town it was, but I vaguely recalled from long ago that it was a gritty, dangerous area. What I found out about the Basin involved numerous and long-standing factors that combine to contribute to the area's hazardous character. The Basin is a waterfront area taken from the natives and created out of tideland marshes by speculators and industrialists in the Gold Rush era. Mission Creek was, and still is to some extent, polluted both by raw human sewage and offal from creekside slaughterhouses. One houseboat resident told me the Channel was a de facto military base during WWII when navy vessels docked there.
I learned that in essence, although the view is nice from the north side of the channel, the southern landfill side is essentially a demilitarised zone and a hotly disputed conversation piece for a myriad of local agencies and planning commissions lobbying for their projects and plans regarding the area. Even Francisco Da Costa, a local environmental expert whom I've often quoted as an impartial source, has recently been accused of making racist remarks (1); he also promotes the creation of a self-sufficient black community in the area. Da Costa is Chief Executive Officer of the South East Sector Community Development Corporation, whose website states: "SESCDC seeks bring about a shift of consciousness from dependency to self-sufficiency among the people of depressed African-American communities and other similar minority communities" (2). As noble a goal as this may be, it addresses long-standing social disparities between the area neighborhoods, and it seems that one of the main functions of the China Basin industrial area is to exist as a sort of buffer zone between SOMA and Bayview residents, whether intentionally or not.
Sources:
1.
Heather Knight - SF Chronicle, March 19, 2008
Francisco Da Costa Gets The Outster From Chris Daly in SF
http://zennie2005.blogspot.com/2008/03/francisco-da-costa-gets-outster-from.html
2.
http://www.sescdc.org/about_us
3.
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local/san_francisco&id=7170988
See also
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/video?id=7169039
Building bonds in the Bayview — one person, one community at a time
Economic Divide of Fillmore and Pacific Heights (final)
The Fillmore and Pacific Heights are connecting neighborhoods with people of different ethnicities, cultures, classes, and social perspectives. The difference between lifestyles are staggeringly opposite yet the difference between streets are only footsteps apart.
“It’s almost like they’re separate countries,” said Jacobs. “I wonder how many of them can acknowledge that.”
The Fillmore district, where 18 percent of their neighborhood is under the poverty line, has long stood as a cultural focal point for the African-American community. The Fillmore is made up of 51 percent African-American, 27 percent Caucasian, 14 percent Asian, and the rest is a mix.
During World War II, many African-Americans located to the Fillmore after Japanese-Americans were made to go to internment camps. But because of urban decay, the Fillmore was designated for redevelopment and many residents were forced out, which created unrest among the inhabitants. The plan was that they could come back but the redevelopment project took much longer than expected, which brewed resentment towards the agency. Houses were replaced with the creation of subsidized units for low-income families. To this day, redevelopment is still a controversial topic in the Fillmore district.
Not too far way from there, are some of the city’s more comfortable dwellers. Of the 30,000 residents of Pacific Heights, according to a real estate demographic research, about 3,000 are blue-collar workers while roughly 18,000 are white collar workers. About 15,500 of the residents have either their bachelor’s or graduate degrees. And the average household income is $117,000. It is a highly desired neighborhood to live in and has won the nickname, “Specific Whites.”
The economic and the racial divide between two such adjacent neighborhoods are quite disheartening. A question for the masses could be whether one of these factors dictate the lives of the inhabitants more than the other.
“I definitely think that it’s more of a class thing than a race thing,” said Jacobs. “The black population is declining in our city, but I don’t think it’s because they’re black, but because they’re poor.”
San Francisco’s African-American population is steadily declining, more so than any other urban city in the nation, according to the North County Times, but some demographers claim that it is because they are migrating to the suburbs once they have enough money, like many other minority groups do.
“I think that eventually all the poor people will be pushed out of the Fillmore and the Tenderloin into the other poor districts in the outskirts of the city, like Bayview and the Excelsior,” said Mary Nguyen, 21, a resident of Lower Pacific Heights for three years.
Nguyen stands on the corner of Fillmore and Pine streets in her black knit beanie, skinny black jeans, and black wedged heels, smoking a Parliament cigarette. “Eventually, all the poor will be concentrated even more than it is now, and the rich will make their way completely on the inside of the city,” said Nguyen. The smoke streamed out of her mouth the way an engine exits steam, consistent and gray.
One cannot help but feel that society is changing in subtle ways. Instead of ostracizing a group of people based on their race the way history has shown us was one of the most insurmountable obstacles our country has gone through, things have regressed to medieval times where class and social standing defined everything. It does not matter what ethnicity you are in modern days, just how many commas you have in your bank statement.
“This definitely catches my attention,” said Jacobs, “but I also see it the way it is. It’s the way history goes.” Jacobs pulls back her wavy brown hair, sips her warm coffee, and takes short strides to the restroom with her arms crossed like a disgruntled mother.
It is undeniable that things are changing, now more than ever. And perhaps it is not enough to acknowledge the problem anymore. In past years, getting people to just see the problem was the most adverse feat, but now it’s getting people to do something about it. There is a social battle going on in this city, not just the Fillmore and Pacific Heights, but throughout every vein and alleyway of San Francisco.
A city can often be viewed as a kingdom, painted with beautiful buildings and utterly boisterous streets filled with people and purposes. In 2010, it is the same social classes that exist now as it did then; the rich keep getting richer and the poor keep getting more poor. The gap grows wider than the ocean. Although most of us can see this gap, it is essential to bridge the two before a modern-day city becomes nothing more than a storybook kingdom of social rank and endless complacency. The Fillmore and Pacific Height are a perfect example of this economic divide.
Changing the look of business in Noe Valley
Recently several large businesses have opened in Noe Valley and are threatening the existence of local stores. The opening of a new grocery store in a neighborhood that has a history of mom and pop stores and non-national chains doesn't usually go over smoothly. When it comes to Noe Valley however, there appears to be an exception. Small business owners like James Omar of the Shufat Market and Charles Kung of the 24th Street Cheese Company want to keep big chain stores out of the neighborhood, but most people in the area are all for the opening of the Whole Foods.
On Sept.30, Whole Foods opened its doors at 3950 24Th St. Since it's arrival in their neighborhood, Whole Foods has received an overwhelmingly positive welcome from the local residents. The small parking lot in front of the store is typically full of cars (how do we know that?), with a line forming down 24Th street and the picnic tables out front are equally full with mothers and strollers on sunny days. "Ultimately customers will determine what business will stay and what will go", said Jack Epstein of Chocolate Covered, the only chocolate shop in Noe Valley.
Most of the smaller stores in Noe Valley will not be able to compete with Whole Food's prices but they can compete for better service by gaining loyalty from customers. This is what several businesses like Bernie's coffee shop and Drewes Brothers Meats are doing. Employees at Bernie's greet each customer when they come in the door, most of them by name, and provide each customer with a sort of personalized experience. This is what Bernie Melvin believes is the key to the success of her coffee shop.
For other stores, offering things like classes for customers and other promotional rebate programs can help build loyalty allowing their bussiness to thrive.
Other Businesses Like PlumpJack Wines are taking what some consider the fight to distributors to get better prices or exclusivity on certain items.
"People should spread their purchases around", said manager Elio Longobardi of PlumpJack wines, who lives in Noe Valley. He shops at Whole Foods, Drewes Brothers Meats, and Noe Valley Bakery.
Still no matter what some small businesses do they are still going to take a big hit and not be able to compete with Whole Foods.
Charles Kung has owned the 24Th Street Cheese Company for 23 years and has recently had to borrow money from his father to keep the business going.
"I'm just waiting for my slow death" said Kung, who is adamantly against Whole Foods opening. He went on to say that people in the neighborhood don't care if small businesses survive.
The future of businesses in Noe Valley will be determined buy customers but small businesses need to realize that they have influence on their customers as well. The power to survive during hard economic times and competition with big business lies with the people.What I Learned About Myself and My Neighborhood
As time went by, I learned not to freak out right before an interview (hint: do it secretly). Of course, there’s also a time when I was totally nervous but I tried to hide it. Journalism is definitely about learning to put a mask on. You can be super clueless in an interview or a meeting but you have to pretend that you understand only to gain a trust that you’re a professional (by the way, you still have to clarify and ask questions later… don’t just stay quiet). You may be bored to tears because the person you interview ramble on about things that are not really interesting or may not be your interest but you still have to put the professional mask and ask questions.
I’m learning to be persistent and not giving up easily. I experience failures and moments of feeling-like-I-want-to-give-up thing but it became less frequent. The crime story was definitely a lot of work. My God… I had a new respect for journalists who write criminal stories now.
As for my neighborhood, I learned to venture outside my comfort zone (read: the mall) and try to emerge myself to the neighborhood. P (Peter Yamamoto) said the best place to hang out with the locals is Benkyodo and that where I spent my time now when I’m in the neigborhood. I can sit there and hear people talking in Japanese. Bummer… I should learn some Japanese to be able to participate in their discussion. A plus for me is that I looked like a Japanese so people seemed to be comfortable to talk to me about their internment time, post- or pre-war story and Japanese culture.
I learned that Japantown was not as financially secured as I thought it was too. I definitely enjoyed talking to people and learning about new things. I hope this new knowledge will be of a use for me in the future.
One too many hits (FINAL)
The decreased business he speaks of is a result of an increasing number of head shops opening on Haight Street. There are 14 of these shops already open in the Haight-Ashbury district, all within close proximity to each other. Siegel has owned Distractions since 1976 and will be closing up shop within the next seven months. His decision came five months after the San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a moratorium banning the opening of new smoke shops on Haight Street. The measure, which was introduced by District 5 Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi and received a unanimous vote, was passed to prohibit any new head shops from opening in the district for the next three years.
Four months before the ban was placed, a large smoke shop called Goodfellas opened on Haight Street. Called the “Wal-Mart of Bongs” by some competitors on the street, Goodfellas draws residents and tourists in with huge window displays of bongs, pipes and tourist merchandise.
John Amaro, 53, has lived between Masonic and Ashbury streets for 15 years and frequents the various smoke shops on Haight Street. He considers Goodfellas to be one of his least favorite smoke shops in the Haight district.
“I feel that owners and operators of Goodfellas have a personal grudge against the other pipe shop operators on the street. They are too in your face,” Amaro said. “It’s a nice store but it’s too large for its own good, and that results in it having no style or direction.”
The style and direction Amaro speaks of first became evident during the 1960s hippie movement that took over the Haight district. Along with the rest of San Francisco during this time, the Haight District gained a reputation for its drug culture with the use of marijuana, LSD and other hallucinogenic drugs. Independently owned bookshops and poster stores soon grew into smoke shops to blend in with the neighborhood.
Not long after the hippie movement began did Siegel decide to open up a business in the Haight district in the late 70s. Most of the shops on the street were boarded up and there were mostly liquor stores. The owner of a smoke shop called The Phoenix was in the process of closing his business, but Siegel didn’t want it to close since he felt the shop was all that was left of the hippie days.
“He said ‘if you want to be the last hippie, here you go,’ and he gave me everything,” Siegel said.
With everything that was given to him, Siegel opened The White Rabbit, which didn’t work out as a business. Afterward, he opened Pipe Dreams, the oldest smoke shop in San Francisco. After business with a partner there was unsuccessful, a new owner took over, and Siegel opened Euphoria Distractions in 1976.
“For many years we did very good business because it was just [Distractions] and Pipe Dreams,” he said. “But then in 1994 they opened up Ashbury Tobacco Center and in the last two years its gotten worse.”
Siegel said that because of so many head shops on Haight Street, including the oversized Goodfellas, he is losing more than $2,000 in business per week. Goodfellas declined to comment on this matter or others related to their recent opening in the district, but their silence doesn’t stop neighbors from speaking their mind about the problem with too many head shops in the area, and the negative effects it has on their business.
“There aren’t enough people buying things. People look, but they don’t buy,” Siegel said. “We’ve got too many stores on Haight Street selling exactly the same stuff. They need to lose half of them.”
While some merchants like Siegel feel that all of the head shops are offering the same merchandise, 24-year-old San Francisco State University alumnus Caryl Carino points out that although some of the products might be the same, there are differences.
“I have noticed that most people who are buying hookah accessories tend to favor one store over the other,” Carino said. “If you go to almost any smoke shop on Haight, prices and selection will vary. It just depends on what the customer needs and wants.”
To 41-year old Marwan Zeidan, owner of Ashbury Tabacco Center, it’s more about the preservation of Haight culture rather than what products are being offered. Zeidan said the shops that have been on the street for a while have grown into the culture of Haight Street, but he has a problem with the newer shops like Goodfellas and believes the displays of smoke pipes in their front windows aren’t good for the neighborhood.
“The newer shops [on Haight Street] don’t embrace the culture of Haight, and the two new stores that opened up are something we just don’t need. We have enough shops to serve the neighborhood,” Zeidan said. “None of the owners are happy, none of the neighbors are happy, and none of the merchants are happy.”
With grief from shop owners joining the smoke in the streets of Upper Haight, Siegel felt it was time to make a move. He went to Ross Mirkarimi asking him to propose a ban to prevent any more from opening, and was told he needed neighbored support. This led him to the Haight-Ashbury Improvement Association.
“When I first went to them they didn’t seem to think it was necessary and didn’t follow through with it,” Siegel said. “But then when Goodfellas opened up everybody in the neighborhood agreed that there’s way too many head shops.”
But by the time the neighborhood came together to discuss the issue, it was too late; Goodfellas had already opened. Haight-Ashbury Improvement Association member Joan Boyd felt that Mirkarimi had betrayed the neighborhood because there was no community communication about Goodfellas’ plan to open a store on Haight Street.
“This ban on head shops is not about protecting the business or profits of existing head shops,” Boyd said. “And by letting Goodfellas open before the ban took effect was really deceptive and hurt existing businesses.”
Mirkarimi and his press secretary Rick Galbraith declined to comment on the unexpected opening of Goodfellas. Carino sees the opening of the large bong shop as the “straw that broke the camels back,” and that it was a store that appeared at the wrong time. But she doesn’t understand the amount of attention that has been brought to Goodfellas specifically.
“I dislike the amount of attention it is getting because there have always been many smoke shops on Haight,” she said. “Like other smoke merchants in the area, the ownership is looking to get a piece of the smoke shop culture in the district; I don’t see what the hype is about.”
But the increasing number of head shops in the Haight district and a possible overturn of the neighborhood’s original hippie culture are not the only concerns. There is also skepticism of the appeal the products sold at these shops might have toward teens. In September, the Food and Drug Administration ruled that the making, distributing or selling of flavored cigarettes is illegal. According to the legislative details of the ban, these flavored cigarettes are marketed toward teens who are under the false impression that these cigarettes don’t contain any nicotine. Boyd feels this is false advertising especially because hookah tobacco doesn’t fall under the category of the banned tobacco products, meaning that smoke shops can still sell it.
“Unbelievably, there is great denial about the harmfulness of smoking. Education of the public has not worked as well as one might think,” she said. “However, people do respond to laws like smoking bans and taxes. ”
One of the only items Carino picks up from these smoke shops is hookah tobacco, and says that with the economy in the state its in, its not the hookah tobacco itself that will necessarily appeal to potential buyers, but the price differences. When she visits the Haight District to buy shisha, she keeps an eye out for which shop has the most reasonable prices.
Many Haight residents and store owners hope that the three-year moratorium will extend and an agreement will arise that permanently bans any more shops from opening. This will put an end to the grief of those that have made their place there more than 20 years ago.
“I know and like a lot of the shop owners,” Amaro said. “But a lot of the pipe shops on Haight Street are there just so they can one up each other.”
The Rise and Fall of Japantown (Final)
Seiko Fujimoto, a Japan Center’s merchant, half-jokingly said it was an Olympic swimming pool. A visitor of the Japan Center said it looked like a shiatsu bath. No one was able to figure out what that thing was exactly. It remained a mystery for everyone for sometime until the construction workers started to put colorful tiles on it.
“It’s a pond,” another visitor said.
The pond is like a premonition of Japantown’s future that is still unknown and in questioned.
San Francisco’s Japantown, one of the three remaining Japantowns in California, struggled to stay afloat. A merchant said in the Japantown Merchants Association’s meeting if sales went down constantly since September.
Steve Nakajo, the co-founder of Kimochi, a non-profit organization that assists senior citizen, said, “Do you see how many people in the Japan Center? It’s dead, man. There are probably two to three people.”
“Do you want a business here?” he asked.
Most community members and activists agree if an immediate action needs to be taken immediately before all of the merchants go out of business.
However, generational and cultural gaps got in the way. Everyone had a different point of view about what was best for Japantown. Each felt strongly about his or her stance and did not seem to willing to let it go.
Some people wanted Japantown to stay the way it was with little changes or minor renovations to bring old customers back. Others wanted to turn around Japantown’s image of being a quiet neighborhood to a hip and cool neighborhood for youngsters and this will be done by bringing trendy places to hang out at Japantown.
E.J. Varela, the food and beverages director of Hotel kabuki, said, “They do not want any society trends.”
Varela directed the statement to people who do not share her point of view and those who preferred to preserve Japantown like it was “a museum.” She mentioned Starbucks, Subway and several big names in the list of “trendy” brands that will bring more people to Japantown.
Under the city’s zoning code, Japantown has a rule that every business in the area has to be culturally relevant. This rule and regulation automatically bans chain restaurants like McDonald’s and retails like Macy’s and Bloomingdale's. The idea is to protect the small businesses in the area but will it help? Do people and businesses think they need to have a McDonald’s in the neighborhood?
Reaching a consensus is definitely a painful thing because there is hardly a middle ground in the process.
Aya Ino, a member of Nihonmachi Roots, a new youth group that taken an interest of Japantown issues related, pointed out the importance of having a dialogue to bridge the wide gap between those who want to preserve and those who want to change.
In the mean time, Japantown continued to show signs of dying and many people became frustrated, racing with the time to save their neighborhood.
These people had every reason to be frustrated: the two community’s newspapers, Nichi Bei Times (founded in 1899) and Hokubei Mainichi (founded in 1948), which had been circulating around Japantown for generations, suddenly disappeared. The two newspapers closed down with just two months in between.
Karen Kai, a community activist, talked about the community’s reaction of the closing of the two newspapers, “Everybody knew about the closing of Nichi Bei but when Hokubei’s closing down, they said, ‘Hokubei?!’”
When Nichi Bei Times announced it would publish its last issue on Sept. 10, Robert Okamura, the owner of a family-owned mochi store, Benkyodo, said even if Nichi Bei Times shut down, they still have the Hokubei Mainichi.
But now, with both newspapers folded up, Japantown’s community had no one to tell the story of the mom and pop store that went out of business and the life journey of a community’s elder who passed away. There will be no more tales about the neighborhood that survived two redevelopments in the past.
Basil Lee, a volunteer in Kimochi, said, “The younger generation, who born here, they adapted to American life. Maybe they don’t like sushi as much. Or rice. They eat hamburger.”
Japanese-American has a very unique identity. They have Japanese roots and history but many assimilate to the American culture. Today, many Japanese-Americans have only a trace of Japanese culture in them.
Fujimoto, who worked and raised her children in the United States, said that her son tried hard to be an American when he grew up and in the process, Fujimoto said she believed her son had became more of an American than a Japanese.
Another problem is language. Language is culture. However, many Japanese-Americans who grew up in the United States have little or no knowledge about Japanese language.
Kai, who served in the advisory board of Japantown Better Neighborhood Plan, said, “During the internment camp, many Japanese, me included, were raised under the belief if the assimilation was the key goal. And piece of that assimilation was to speak flawless English so my parents never sent me to Japanese school.”
Many parts of the culture are lost in translation. Thus, the generations of Japanese who do not speak the language will probably feel weaker connections with their roots and less eagerness to learn and pass on their culture to the next generation. When the language died, the culture died too.
Peter Yamamoto of the National Japanese American Historical Society said Japantown has a slow replenishing rate from immigration to keep it alive.
If what Yamamoto said was true, who will keep Japantown alive? Will it even needed to have a Japantown when the younger generations feel less attachment with the Japanese culture?
Benh Nakajo, a community activist who worked at Benkyodo, said, “[Our] goal is to leave something for the future generation. At least, physically.”
From there, the fight continued.
While some stores closed, others open. NEW PEOPLE, a new store in Japantown that markets itself on the image of Japanese pop-culture, was hoped to bring more people, especially youths, to the neighborhood. On a community forum on the Japanese-American Press, there was also a possibility to turn both of the community’s newspapers into non-profit organizations just to keep them going. While some people moved out of Japantown, grassroots organizations like Nihonmachi Roots appeared and organized to promote Japantown. When one thing falls, another rises.